4.7 Review

Drug discovery in academia

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-CELL PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 286, Issue 3, Pages C465-C474

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00397.2003

Keywords

high-throughput screening; drug development; pharmacology; fluorescence; cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator

Funding

  1. NEI NIH HHS [EY-13574] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-59198, HL-73856] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIBIB NIH HHS [EB-00415] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK-35124] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Drug discovery and development is generally done in the commercial rather than the academic realm. Drug discovery involves target discovery and validation, lead identification by high-throughput screening, and lead optimization by medicinal chemistry. Follow-up preclinical evaluation includes analysis in animal models of compound efficacy and pharmacology (ADME: administration, distribution, metabolism, elimination) and studies of toxicology, specificity, and drug interactions. Notwithstanding the high-cost, labor-intensive, and non-hypothesis-driven aspects of drug discovery, the academic setting has a unique and expanding niche in this important area of investigation. For example, academic drug discovery can focus on targets of limited commercial value, such as third-world and rare diseases, and on the development of research reagents such as high-affinity inhibitors for pharmacological gene knockout in animal models (chemical genetics). This review describes the practical aspects of the preclinical drug discovery process for academic investigators. The discovery of small molecule inhibitors and activators of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator is presented as an example of an academic drug discovery program that has yielded new compounds for physiology research and clinical development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available