4.6 Article

Non-classical localization of androgen receptor in the C2C12 skeletal muscle cell line

Journal

ARCHIVES OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS
Volume 530, Issue 1, Pages 13-22

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2012.12.011

Keywords

Androgen receptors; Skeletal muscle; Subcellular distribution; Mitochondria; Membranes

Funding

  1. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET)
  2. Universidad Nacional del Sur, Argentina

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The classical model of testosterone action has been traditionally described as being mediated by the androgen receptor (AR) localized exclusively in the nucleus. However, there is increasing functional evidence for extranuclear localization of AR. We present biochemical and immunological data supporting mitochondrial and microsomal localization of AR in the C2C12 skeletal muscle cell line. As a first approach AR was detected by immunoblotting, using specific antibodies after subcellular fractionation, not only in nucleus and cytosol, but also in mitochondria and microsomes. We then established [H-3] testosterone binding characteristics in total homogenates and subcellular fractions. Specific and saturable [H-3] testosterone binding sites were detected in mitochondria and microsomes. Immunolocalization of the non-classical AR was also confirmed using confocal microscopy. Sucrose gradient fractionation demonstrated the presence of the AR in lipid rafts and caveolae. Besides, the AR interacts physically with Caveolin-1, association that is lost after testosterone treatment. Accordingly, Western blot analysis revealed a decrease of AR expression in the microsomal fraction after testosterone treatment, suggesting translocation of the membrane AR to another subcellular compartment. The non-classical distribution of native pools of AR in skeletal muscle cells suggests an alternative mode of AR localization/function. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available