4.7 Article

Does variability in shoot carbon assimilation within the tree crown explain variability in peach fruit growth?

Journal

TREE PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 313-322

Publisher

HERON PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/24.3.313

Keywords

branch autonomy; photosynthesis; radiative transfer; three-dimensional modeling

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A three-dimensional model of radiative transfer and leaf gas exchange was used to quantify daily carbon (C) assimilation of all fruit-bearing shoots (FBS) in an early maturing 6-year-old peach tree (Prunus persica L. Batsch) with a heavy crop load. For a sample of FBS (n = 36), growth of fruit and leafy shoots was measured every 1-2 weeks from 24 days after bloom (DAB) until harvest, between 93-101 DAB. The objective was to relate shoot C assimilation with harvested fruit mass for each shoot to test the hypothesis that variation in C supply contributes significantly to variation in fruit growth within and among FBS. Mean C assimilation of the sampled shoots was 0.07 g C fruit(-1) day(-1), but varied between 0.014 and 0.32 g C fruit(-1) day(-1). This indicates that C availability for fruit growth would have varied significantly among individual FBS if they were autonomous. Mean fruit dry mass on each FBS varied between 0.716 and 7.68 g C at hat-vest, and most of the variation originated among, not within, individual FBS. However, there were no correlations between the mean and standard deviation of fruit mass and fruit relative growth rate when each was plotted against shoot C assimilation, indicating that factors such as those regulating C demand of fruit, or C transfer among individual FBS, may be more important in controlling variability in fruit growth than intra-crown variability in shoot C assimilation. Under the study conditions, FBS were non-autonomous for C, because a model of fruit and leafy shoot growth was unable to reproduce the observed growth without supplementary contribution of C from shoots without fruit.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available