4.7 Article

Prepulse facilitation and prepulse inhibition in schizophrenia patients and their unaffected siblings

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 55, Issue 5, Pages 518-523

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2003.10.018

Keywords

startle; prepulse inhibition; prepulse facilitation; orienting; schizophrenia; endophenotypic marker

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [MH-46433, MH43292, MH14584] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Deficits in schizophrenia patients and their first-degree relatives have been reported in prepulse inhibition (PPI), a phenomenon that measures an early stage of information processing (sensorimotor gating). It is less clear whether these information processing deficits extend to prepulse facilitation (PPF), which measures a later stage of generalized alerting or orienting. Methods. This study examined three separate issues: first, whether schizophrenia patients have deficits in PPI and PPF; second, whether the siblings of patients show deficits in these processes; and third, whether prepulse duration influences the degree of the deficits. These issues were examined in 76 schizophrenia patients, 36 of their siblings, and 41 normal control subjects. Results: Patients and siblings did not differ from control subjects in PPI, perhaps due to the use of different procedural parameters compared with other laboratories that have consistently found PPI deficits in schizophrenia patients. Patients and their siblings produced significantly less PPF than control subjects. For both PPI and PPF, prepulse duration was not a significant factor. Conclusions: These results imply that PPF deficits reveal a generalized alerting or orienting deficit that is present in both schizophrenia patients and their siblings, suggesting that this deficit may be tapping an endophenotypic vulnerability factor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available