4.6 Review

Flavonoids and cognition: The molecular mechanisms underlying their behavioural effects

Journal

ARCHIVES OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS
Volume 492, Issue 1-2, Pages 1-9

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2009.10.003

Keywords

Flavonoid; Brain; Memory; Signalling; Vascular system

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/F008953/1, BB/C518222/1, BB/G005702/1, BB/E023185/1]
  2. Medical Research Council [G0400278/NI02]
  3. BBSRC [BB/G005702/1, BB/E023185/1, BB/F008953/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/F008953/1, BB/E023185/1, BB/C518222/1, BB/G005702/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Evidence Suggests that a group of phytochemicals known as flavonoids are highly effective in reversing age-related declines in neuro-cognitive performance through their ability to interact with the cellular and molecular architecture of the brain responsible for memory and by reducing neuronal loss due to neurodegenerative Processes. In particular, they may increase the number of, and strength of, connections between neurons, via their specific interactions with the ERK and Akt signalling pathways, leading to an increase in neurotrophins Such as BDNF. Concurrently, their effects on the peripheral and Cerebral vascular system may also lead to enhancements in cognitive performance through increased brain blood flow and an ability to initiate neurogenesis in the hippocampus. Finally, they have also been shown to reduce neuronal damage and losses induced by various neurotoxic species and neuroinflammation. Together, these processes act to maintain the number and quality of synaptic connections in the brain. a factor known to be essential for efficient LTP, synaptic plasticity and ultimately the efficient working of memory. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available