4.7 Article

Quantum and classical studies of the O(3P)+H2(v=0-3,j=0)→OH+H reaction using benchmark potential surfaces

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 120, Issue 9, Pages 4316-4323

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.1642580

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present results of time-dependent quantum mechanics (TDQM) and quasiclassical trajectory (QCT) studies of the excitation function for O(P-3)+H-2(v=0-3,j=0)-->OH+H from threshold to 30 kcal/mol collision energy using benchmark potential energy surfaces [Rogers , J. Phys. Chem. A 104, 2308 (2000)]. For H-2(v=0) there is excellent agreement between quantum and classical results. The TDQM results show that the reactive threshold drops from 10 kcal/mol for v=0 to 6 for v=1, 5 for v=2 and 4 for v=3, suggesting a much slower increase in rate constant with vibrational excitation above v=1 than below. For H-2(v>0), the classical results are larger than the quantum results by a factor similar to2 near threshold, but the agreement monotonically improves until they are within similar to10% near 30 kcal/mol collision energy. We believe these differences arise from stronger vibrational adiabaticity in the quantum dynamics, an effect examined before for this system at lower energies. We have also computed QCT OH(v',j') state-resolved cross sections and angular distributions. The QCT state-resolved OH(v') cross sections peak at the same vibrational quantum number as the H-2 reagent. The OH rotational distributions are also quite hot and tend to cluster around high rotational quantum numbers. However, the dynamics seem to dictate a cutoff in the energy going into OH rotation indicating an angular momentum constraint. The state-resolved OH distributions were fit to probability functions based on conventional information theory extended to include an energy gap law for product vibrations. (C) 2004 American Institute of Physics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available