4.6 Article

Modeling a task that is sensitive to dementia of the Alzheimer's type: individual differences in acquisition of a visuo-spatial paired-associate learning task in rhesus monkeys

Journal

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 149, Issue 2, Pages 123-133

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0166-4328(03)00214-6

Keywords

learning; memory; CANTAB; Alzheimer's; cognition

Funding

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [DA05831, R01 DA013390-03, R01 DA013390-02, DA09111, DA13390, R01 DA013390-01] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [MH47680] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Early detection of progressive diseases such as Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is crucial for both the treatment and study of the disease. Performance on a visuo-spatial paired-associates learning (vsPAL) task was recently shown to reliably predict a diagnosis of AD in aged populations. The present study reports the development of this vsPAL task for use in nonhuman primates. Translation of vsPAL to a nonhuman model may provide improved preclinical tools for study of the etiology and treatment of dementia. Twelve young adult male rhesus monkeys were trained to perform the vsPAL task concurrently with tests comprising a nonhuman primate neuropsychological test battery. Monkeys successfully learned to perform vsPAL and did so in a task-difficulty ranked fashion. Despite significant individual differences in capability in the acquisition of the recognition memory aspects of the task, all monkeys evidenced the ability to learn within-trial, i.e. to improve with repeated stimulus-location pairings. These results support the use of vsPAL performance under various challenge conditions to investigate the possible substrates of early cognitive decline in AD. Comparison of performance on vsPAL with performance on other memory tasks in the battery will be of more general use in differentiating mechanisms involved in various aspects of mnemonic function. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available