4.6 Article

The base exchange reaction of NAD+ glycohydrolase: Identification of novel heterocyclic alternative substrates

Journal

ARCHIVES OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS
Volume 479, Issue 2, Pages 114-120

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2008.09.005

Keywords

CD38; Transglycosidation; Inhibitor; Alternative substrate; Amrinone; Milrinone; Pinacidil

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ADP-ribosyl cyclase and NAD(+) glycohydrolase (CD38, E.C.3.2.2.5) efficiently catalyze the exchange of the nicotinamidyl moiety of NAD(+), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP(+)) or nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN+) with an alternative base. 4'-Pyridinyl drugs (amrinone, milrinone, dismerinone and pinacidil) were efficient alternative substrates (k(cat)/K-M = 0.9-10 mu M-1 s(-1)) in the exchange reaction with ADP-ribosyl cyclase. When CD38 was used as a catalyst the k(cat)/K-M values for the exchange reaction were reduced two or more orders of magnitude (0.015-0.15 mu M-1 s(-1)). The products of this reaction were novel dinucleotides. The values of the equilibrium constants for dinucleotide formation were determined for several drugs. These enzymes also efficiently catalyze the formation of novel mononucleotides in an exchange reaction with NMN+, k(cat)/K-M = 0.05-0.4 mu M-1 s(-1). The k(cat)/K-M values for the exchange reaction with NMN+ were generally similar (0.04-0.12 mu M-1 s(-1)) with CD38 and ADP-ribosyl cyclase as catalysts. Several novel heterocyclic alternative substrates were identified as 2-isoquinolines, 1,6-naphthyridines and tricyclic bases. The k(cat)/K-M values for the exchange reaction with these substrates varied over five orders of magnitude and approached the limit of diffusion with 1,6-naphthyridines. The exchange reaction could be used to synthesize novel mononucleotides or to identify novel reversible inhibitors of CD38. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available