4.7 Article

ADAM9 expression in pancreatic cancer is associated with tumour type and is a prognostic factor in ductal adenocarcinoma

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 90, Issue 5, Pages 1053-1058

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601645

Keywords

pancreatic cancer; ADAM9; gene profiling; immunohistochemistry; prognosis; survival

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gene expression profiling revealed ADAM9 to be distinctly overexpressed in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We examined the relevance of ADAM9 expression in PDAC diagnosis and prognosis. A total of 59 infiltrating PDACs, 32 specimens from patients with chronic pancreatitis, II endocrine tumours and 24 acinar cell carcinomas were immunohistochemically analysed for ADAM9 expression. Staining for ADAM9 was detected in 58 out of 59 (98.3%) PDACs and in two out of 24 (8.3%) acinar cell carcinomas, but not in endocrine tumours. In the non-neoplastic pancreas, whether normal or chronically inflamed, ADAM9 was expressed in centroacinar and intralobular duct cells, but not in interlobular duct cells and their hyperplastic lesions. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas showing cytoplasmic ADAM9 expression correlated with poor tumour differentiation and also with shorter over-all survival than in cases showing only an apical membranous staining pattern (P = 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified cytoplasmic ADAM9 expression as an independent marker of shortened survival in a set of 42 curatively (R0) resected PDAC (P < 0.05, hazard ratio 2.85, 95% confidence interval: 1.21-6.71). The results show that ADAM9 expression distinguishes PDACs from other solid pancreatic tumours. In addition, cytoplasmic ADAM9 overexpression is associated with poor differentiation and shortened survival. Therefore, ADAM9 overexpression might contribute to the aggressiveness of PDACs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available