4.8 Article

Flame spray synthesis of Pd/Al2O3 catalysts and their behavior in enantioselective hydrogenation

Journal

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
Volume 222, Issue 2, Pages 307-314

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2003.10.012

Keywords

flame spray pyrolysis; palladium; alumina; hydrogenation; methoxypyrone; chiral; enantioselective; asymmetric; PACS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flame spray pyrolysis (FSP) was used for the synthesis of alumina-supported palladium catalysts containing 1-7.5 wt% Pd. Precursor solutions of aluminum sec-butoxide and palladium acetylacetonate were sprayed and combusted, resulting in nanostructured materials that were characterized by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, CO-pulse chemisorption, nitrogen adsorption, and X-ray diffraction. Well-dispersed palladium particles (1-5 nm) were confined to the alumina surface. Palladium dispersion depended on the metal loading and decreased for higher amounts of Pd. The FSP-derived alumina-supported palladium catalysts were chirally modified with cinchonine and tested for the enantioselective hydrogenation of 4-methoxy-6-methyl-2-pyrone. Rate and enantioselectivity decreased with higher Pd dispersion. A comparison of these catalysts to a corresponding commercial Pd/Al2O3 catalyst revealed lower reaction rate and enantioselectivity for the FSP-derived catalysts. However, hydrogen pretreatment of the flame-made catalysts at 500 degreesC improved rate and enantioselectivity strongly, whereas only a comparatively weak beneficial effect was observed with the corresponding wet-phase-derived catalysts. Enantiomeric excess in the formation of (R)-4-methoxy-6-methyl-5,6-dihydro-2-pyrone reached 80% for flame-made catalysts after pretreatment in hydrogen. Hydrogen pretreatment temperatures above 600 degreesC led to sintering of the Pd particles and drastic loss in activity and enantioselectivity. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available