4.6 Article

Age-related impaired type 1 T cell responses to influenza: Reduced activation ex vivo, decreased expansion in CTL culture in vitro, and blunted response to influenza vaccination in vivo in the elderly

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 172, Issue 6, Pages 3437-3446

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.6.3437

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG00834] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to analyze the changes in the type 1 T cell response, including the CD4(+) Th1 and CD8(+) T cell responses, to influenza in the elderly compared with those in young adults. PBMC activated ex vivo with influenza virus exhibited an age-related decline in type 1 T cell response, shown by the decline in the frequency of IFN-gamma-secreting memory T cells specific for influenza, (IFN-gamma(+) ISMT) using ELISPOT or intracellular cytokine staining. The reduced frequency of IFN-gamma(+) ISMT was accompanied by a reduced level of IFN-gamma secretion per cell in elderly subjects. Tetramer staining, combined with IFN-gamma ELISPOT, indicated that the decline in IFN-gamma(+), influenza M1-peptide-specific T cells was not due to attrition of the T cell repertoire, but, rather, to the functional loss of ISMT with age. In addition, the decline in type 1 T cell response was. not due to an increase in Th2 response or defects in APCs from the elderly. The expansion of influenza-specific CD8(+) T cells in CTL cultures was reduced in the elderly. Compared with young subjects, frail elderly subjects also exhibited a blunted and somewhat delayed type 1 T cell response to influenza vaccination, which correlated positively with the reduced IgG1 subtype and the total Ab response. Taken together, these data demonstrate that there is a decline in the type 1 T cell response to influenza with age that may help explain the age-related decline in vaccine efficacy and the increases in influenza morbidity and mortality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available