4.7 Article

Conserved mechanisms across development and tumorigenesis revealed by a mouse development perspective of human cancers

Journal

GENES & DEVELOPMENT
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages 629-640

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gad.1182504

Keywords

cerebellar development; medulloblastoma; comparative genomics; multiscale models; metastasis; principle component analysis

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [U01 HL066582, HL066582-01] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK00837, K12 DK063696] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [P01 NS040828, P50 NS040828, R21 NS41764-01, R01 NS35701, R01 NS4051, NS40828-01A1] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

identification of common mechanisms underlying organ development and primary tumor formation should yield new insights into tumor biology and facilitate the generation of relevant cancer models. We have developed a novel method to project the gene expression profiles of medulloblastomas (MBs)-human cerebellar tumors-onto a mouse cerebellar development sequence: postnatal days 1-60 (P1-P60). Genomically, human medulloblastomas were closest to mouse P1-P10 cerebella, and normal human cerebella were closest to mouse P30-P60 cerebella. Furthermore, metastatic MBs were highly associated with mouse P5 cerebella, suggesting that a clinically distinct subset of tumors is identifiable by molecular similarity to a precise developmental stage. Genewise, down- and up-regulated MB genes segregate to late and early stages of development, respectively. Comparable results for human lung cancer vis-a-vis the developing mouse lung suggest the generalizability of this multiscalar developmental perspective on tumor biology. Our findings indicate both a recapitulation of tissue-specific developmental programs in diverse solid tumors and the utility of tumor characterization on the developmental time axis for identifying novel aspects of clinical and biological behavior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available