4.6 Article

Critical protection from renal ischemia reperfusion injury by CD55 and CD59

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 172, Issue 6, Pages 3869-3875

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.6.3869

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI-49344, AI-44970] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Renal ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is a feature of ischemic acute renal failure and it impacts both short- and long-term graft survival after kidney transplantation. Complement activation has been implicated in renal IRI, but its mechanism of action is uncertain and the determinants of complement activation during IRI remain poorly understood. We engineered mice deficient in two membrane complement regulatory proteins, CD55 and CD59, and used them to investigate the role of these endogenous complement inhibitors in renal IRI. CD55-deficient (CD55(-/-)), but not CD59-deficient (CD59(-/-)), mice exhibited increased renal IRI as indicated by significantly elevated blood urea nitrogen levels, histological scores, and neutrophil infiltration. Remarkably, although CD59 deficiency alone was inconsequential, CD55/CD59 double deficiency greatly exacerbated IRI. Severe IRI in CD55(-/-)CD59(-/-) mice was accompanied by endothelial deposition of C3 and the membrane attack complex (MAC) and medullary capillary thrombosis. Complement depletion in CD55(-/-)CD59(-/-) mice with cobra venom factor prevented these effects. Thus, CD55 and CD59 act synergistically to inhibit complement-mediated renal IRI, and abrogation of their function leads to MAC-induced microvascular injury and dysfunction that may exacerbate the initial ischemic assault. Our findings suggest a rationale for anti-complement therapies aimed at preventing microvascular injury during ischemia,reperfusion, and the CD55(-/-)CD59(-/-) mouse provides a useful animal model in this regard.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available