4.7 Article

Quantifying the drivers of star formation on galactic scales. I. The Small Magellanic Cloud

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 604, Issue 1, Pages 167-175

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/381795

Keywords

galaxies : evolution; galaxies : interactions; galaxies : stellar content; Magellanic Clouds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We use the star formation history of the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) to place quantitative limits on the effect of tidal interactions and gas infall on the star formation and chemical enrichment history of the SMC. The coincident timing of two recent (<4 Gyr ago) increases in the star formation rate and SMC-Milky Way (MW) pericenter passages suggests that global star formation in the SMC is driven at least in part by tidal forces due to the MW. The Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) is the other potential driver of star formation, but is only near the SMC during the most recent burst. The poorly constrained LMC-SMC orbit is our principal uncertainty. To explore the correspondence between bursts and MW pericenter passages further, we model star formation in the SMC using a combination of continuous and tidally triggered star formation. The behavior of the tidally triggered mode is a strong inverse function of the SMC-MW separation (preferred behavior ∼r(-5), resulting in a factor of ∼100 difference in the rate of tidally triggered star formation at pericenter and apocenter). Despite the success of these closed-box evolutionary models in reproducing the recent SMC star formation history and current chemical abundance, they have some systematic shortcomings that are remedied by postulating that a sizable infall event (∼50% of the total gas mass) occurred ∼4 Gyr ago. Regardless of whether this infall event is included, the fraction of stars in the SMC that formed via a tidally triggered mode is >10%, and could be as large as 70%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available