4.7 Article

Anterior cingulate volume predicts response to cognitive behavioral therapy in major depressive disorder

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 174, Issue -, Pages 397-399

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.009

Keywords

Anterior cingulate cortex; Cognitive behavioral therapy; Depression; Magnetic resonance imaging; Voxel-based morphometry

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [23791326]
  2. SENSHIN Medical Research Foundation
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of japan [22220003, 24243061, 23118004, 23120009]
  4. Health and Labour Science Research Grant for Comprehensive Research on Disability Health and Welfare from Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare [H25-seishin-jitsuyouka-ippan-001]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23791326, 15H01690, 22220003] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is widely used to treat major depressive disorder (MDD). Although improved response prediction could facilitate the development of individualized treatment plans, few studies have investigated whether underlying brain structure is related to CBT response in MDD. Methods: Ten MDD patients who received individual CBT were studied in this study. We investigated the relationship between the regional gray matter (GM) volume and subsequent responses to CBT using voxel-based morphometry. Results: The degree of improvement in depressive symptoms was positively correlated with GM volume in the caudal portion of the anterior cingulate cortex. Limitations: The sample size was small, and the effects of medication on the results could not be excluded. Conclusions: Our results, although preliminary, suggest that the anterior cingulate cortex is a key structure whose volume can be used to predict responses to CBT and is thus a potential prognostic marker in MDD. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved,

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available