4.7 Article

Group metacognitive therapy for repetitive negative thinking in primary and non-primary generalized anxiety disorder: An effectiveness trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 175, Issue -, Pages 124-132

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.046

Keywords

Metacognitive therapy; Repetitive negative thinking; Generalized anxiety disorder; Worry; Effectiveness

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a common and highly comorbid anxiety disorder characterized by repetitive negative thinking (RNT). Treatment trials tend to exclude individuals with non-primary GAD, despite this being a common presentation in real world clinics. RNT is also associated with multiple emotional disorders, suggesting that it should be targeted regardless of the primary disorder. This study evaluated the acceptability and effectiveness of brief group metacognitive therapy (EVICT) for primary or non-primary GAD within a community clinic. Methods: Patients referred to a specialist community clinic attended six, two-hour weekly sessions plus a one-month follow-up (N=52). Measures of metacognitive beliefs. RNT, symptoms, positive and negative affect, and quality of life were completed at the first, last, and follow-up sessions. Results.: Attrition was low and large intent-to-treat effects were observed on most outcomes, particularly for negative metacognitive beliefs and RNT. Treatment gains increased further to follow-up. Benchmarking comparisons demonstrated that outcomes compared favorably to longer disorder-specific protocols for primary GAD. Limitations: No control group or independent assessment of protocol adherence. Conclusions: Brief metacognitive therapy is an acceptable and powerful treatment for patients with primary or non-primary GAD. (C) 2014 Elsevier By. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available