3.8 Article

Cytogenetics and fluorescence in situ hybridization assessment of sex-chromosome mosaicism in Klinefelter's syndrome

Journal

ANNALES DE GENETIQUE
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages 163-175

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.anngen.2003.08.024

Keywords

Barr body; FISH; infertility; karyotype; Klinefefter's syndrome; testis biopsy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A retrospective study was carried out in 152 infertile men to determine the prevalence of sex chromosome abnormalities among non-obstructive azoospermic and severe oligospermic men (n = 51) and to evaluate the feasibility of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques to assess mosaicim in Klinefelter's patients in comparison with conventional cytogenetics. Cytogenetic analysis were performed for 51 infertile men and among 14 chromosomal abnormalities found, nine were compatible with Klinefelter's syndrome. FISH staining with a CEP X/CEP Y probes were performed for Klinefelter's patients and for live of them; testes were biopsied for histopathologic examination. Six Klinefelter's patients showed a non-mosaic 47,XXY and three showed a 47,XXY/46,XY mosaic by G or R banding analysis f 20 cells with a ratio of 17%, 20% and 33%, respectively. FISH analysis confirmed mosaicism in only one patient (the first) in whom a third cells population was found. There was no relationship between the ratios of mosaicism by banding and FISH analysis. Conventional histopathologic findings in five non-mosaic Klinefelter's patients confirm the diagnosis of Sertoli Only Cells syndrome. FISH is recommended in Klinefelter's syndrome to define exactly the cytogenetic statute as mosaic or non-mosaic and then discussing prognosis and decision regarding fertility counseling. (C) 2003 Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available