4.2 Article

Comparison of epsilon aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid in pediatric cardiac surgery

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 141-143

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2004.01.016

Keywords

antifibrinolytics; aminocaproic acid; tranexamic acid; blood loss; postoperative

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: This study compared the efficacy of aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid in reducing postoperative blood loss, as well as blood and blood product requirements in children with cyanotic congenital heart disease. Design: A prospective randomized study. Setting: Cardiac center of a tertiary care, referral hospital. Participants: One hundred fifty children in the age group of 2 months to 14.5 years with cyanotic congenital heart disease undergoing corrective surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Interventions: Patients were randomized into 3 groups. Group A was given aminocaproic acid in a dose of 100 mg/kg after anesthetic induction, 100 mg/kg on CPB and 100 mg/kg after protamine. Group T was given tranexamic acid, 10 mg/kg, after anesthetic induction, 10 mg/kg on CPB, and 10 mg/kg after protamine. Group C was the control group. Main Result. Control group had the longest sternal closure time, maximum blood loss at 24 hours, and maximum requirements of blood and blood products. Among the 2 groups given antifibrinolytics, there was no significant difference in postoperative blood loss, blood and product requirement, and reexploration rates. Conclusion: Aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid are equally effective in reducing postoperative blood loss, as well as blood and blood product requirements in children with cyanotic heart disease undergoing corrective surgery as compared with the control group. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available