4.6 Article

The relationship between cholesteryl ester transfer protein levels and risk factor profile in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia

Journal

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
Volume 173, Issue 2, Pages 261-267

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2003.11.020

Keywords

cholesteryl ester transfer protein; high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; statin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) mediates the transfer of neutral lipids between lipoproteins. The role of CETP in atherogenesis is controversial. To better understand the relationships between plasma CETP levels, lipoproteins and atherosclerosis, we assessed these parameters in patients with an enhanced risk for atherosclerosis. Methods and results: We investigated 281 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) in which the effects of two statins were compared in a 2-year, randomized, double-blinded study. Patients were stratified in quartiles according to their CETP baseline levels. In addition to correlations with decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), increased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) and enhanced triglyceride levels, higher CETP levels were also associated with reduced HDL particle size, and smaller and denser LDL. Statins reduced plasma CETP levels and atherogenic lipoproteins. Nevertheless, baseline CETP concentration was positively associated with IMT after 2 years of therapy. Conclusion: This study provides evidence that CETP levels are associated with a more atherogenic lipid profile and increased progression of atherosclerosis. Stalin treatment improved the lipoprotein profile in FH patients, but to a lesser extent in those with high CETP levels. These findings might imply that statin treatment does not entirely counteract the lipoprotein abnormalities associated with high CETP levels. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available