4.8 Article

Comparison between thermal and ozone regenerations of spent activated carbon exhausted with phenol

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 38, Issue 8, Pages 2155-2165

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.01.030

Keywords

activated carbon; adsorption; ozone; regeneration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thermal and ozone regenerations of granular activated carbons (GAC) used in the removal of phenol from aqueous solution have been studied. The phenol isotherms for virgin GAC could be well represented by the Langmuir equation. Direct ozonation of GAC introduced large amounts of acidic surface oxygen groups, which caused a decrease in the phenol uptake. Thermogravimetric methods were used to investigate the mechanism of phenol adsorption onto virgin and ozonated carbons. Thermal regeneration was carried out at 1123 K using nitrogen (pyrolysis alone) or nitrogen and carbon dioxide (pyrolysis plus oxidation). Results showed that spent carbons do not recover their adsorption characteristics when heated under inert conditions whereas carbon dioxide regeneration was effective at about 15% wt burn-off. Regeneration of GAC was also carried out with ozone as oxidizing gas at room temperature. Ozone dose and the nature of GAC have much influence on the regeneration performance. For an individual GAC there exits an optimum ozone dose for which phenol is eliminated together with most of its oxidation by-products without incurring in carbon surface chemical alterations. However, if excessive ozone is applied some acidic surface groups are formed on the GAC, thereby decreasing the adsorption capacity for phenol. Results showed that spent carbons can recover most of their adsorption characteristics and specific surface areas when regenerated through a number of adsorption-ozone regeneration cycles. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available