4.6 Article

Prevalence, incidence, and progression of myopia of school children in Hong Kong

Journal

INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages 1071-1075

Publisher

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.03-1151

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE. To determine the prevalence, incidence, and progression of myopia of Chinese children in Hong Kong. METHODS. A cross-sectional survey was initially conducted. A longitudinal follow-up study was then conducted 12 months later. RESULTS. A total of 7560 children of mean age 9.33 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 9.11 - 9.45; range, 5 - 16) participated in the study. Mean spherical equivalent refraction (SER) was - 0.33 D (SD = 11.56; range, - 13.13 to + 14.25 D). Myopia ( SER less than or equal to - 0.50 D) was the most common refractive error and was found in 36.71% +/- 2.87% (SD) of children. Prevalence of myopia correlated positively with older age. Children aged 11 years were almost 15 times more likely to have myopia than were children younger than 7 years (Odds ratio [OR] = 14.81; 95% CI = 14.17 - 15.48). Incidence of myopia was 144.1 +/- 2.31 ( SD) per 1000 primary school children per annum. Increasing age was correlated with increased incidence of myopia, with highest risk in children ages 11 years (OR = 2.27; 95% CI = 2.11 - 2.44). The average annual change in SER for children with myopia (SER less than or equal to - 0.50 D) was - 0.63 D (SD = 3.44) compared with - 0.29 D (SD = 2.96) for those who were not myopic at the beginning of the study ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS. The results show that the prevalence and progression of myopia in Hong Kong children was much higher than those previously reported in Western countries. The long-term socioeconomic impact of these findings warrants further studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available