4.7 Article

Evaluation of the microbiological safety and sensory quality of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) processed by the sous vide method

Journal

FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages 193-201

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0740-0020(03)00053-4

Keywords

fish; sous vide; trout; microbiology; safety

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work evaluates the microbiological quality and sensorial characteristics of rainbow trout processed by the sous vide method under different time/temperature conditions and stored at 2degreesC and 10degreesC. The equivalent heat treatments applied in core were: 3.3 min at 90degreesC (PV70 in core 331.64), 1.04 min at 90degreesC (PV70 in core 104.5) and 5.18 min at 70degreesC (PV70 in core 5.18). The product stored at 2degreesC or 10degreesC was periodically evaluated to investigate its sensory quality, microbiological condition and proximate composition. The batches stored at 2degreesC had lower growth counts or mesophiles and psychrotrophs. Moreover, these counts decreased by increasing the heating temperature and time. Staphylococcus aureus, and Listeria monocytogenes were not found in any of the samples. Neither aerobic nor Bacillus cereus, Clostridium anaerobic spores were detected in the trout samples processed at 90degreesC for 3.3 min in core and stored at 2degreesC after 45 days. A heat treatment of 90degreesC for 3.3 min in core was the most effective to extend the shelf-life of trout (> 45 days). Therefore, it can be concluded that the treatment at 90degreesC for 3.3 min in core is the most effective to ensure the safety and extend the shelf-life of sous vide trout preserving its sensory characteristics. This study establishes the microbiological quality of sous vide trout and emphasizes the relevance of the microbiological quality of the raw materials, heat treatment and storage temperature to ensure the safety of the product, since this fatty fish is not eviscerated and high counts can be found in the raw fish. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available