4.2 Article

Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein kinetics in postoperative pediatric cardiac surgical patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 160-165

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2004.01.021

Keywords

cardiopulmonary bypass; systemic inflammatory response; procalcitonin; C-reactive protein; sepsis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine the kinetics of procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration after pediatric cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Design: Prospective, clinical cohort study. Setting: A fifteen-bed tertiary-care pediatric intensive care unit. Patients: Fourteen pediatric patients admitted for cardiac surgery. Measurements and Main Results: Serum PCT and CRP were measured before cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB); after CPB; and on the first, second, and third days after surgery by means of immunoluminometry and nephelometry, respectively. Reference values for systemic inflammatory response syndrome are 0.5 to 2.0 ng/mL for PCT and <5 mg/L for CRP. Baseline serum PCT and CRP concentrations were 0.24 +/- 0.13 ng/mL and 4.06 +/- 3.60 mg/L (median 25th percentile-75th percentile), respectively. PCT concentrations increased progressively from the end of CPB (0.62 +/- 0.30 ng/mL), peaked at 24 hours postoperatively (POD1) (0.77 +/- 0.49 ng/mL), and began to decrease at 48 hours or POD2 (0.35 +/- 0.21 ng/mL). CRP increased just after CPB (58.82 +/- 42.23 mg/L) and decreased after 72 hours (7.09 +/- 9.81 mg/L). Conclusion: An increment of both PCT and CRP was observed just after CPB. However, PCT values remained within reference values, whereas CRP concentrations increased significantly after CPB until the third day. These preliminary results suggest that PCT was more effective than CRP to monitor patients with SIRS and a favorable outcome. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available