4.7 Article

Recent trends in the incidence of anxiety and prescription of anxiolytics and hypnotics in children and young people: An e-cohort study

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 183, Issue -, Pages 134-141

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.05.002

Keywords

Anxiety; Anxiolytic; Hypnotic; Primary care; Children; Young people

Funding

  1. National Institute of Social Care and Health Research [H07-3-033]
  2. Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research
  3. Arthritis Research UK
  4. British Heart Foundation
  5. Cancer Research UK
  6. Economic and Social Research Council
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  8. Medical Research Council
  9. National Institute of Health Research
  10. National Institute for Social Care and Health Research (Welsh Government)
  11. Chief Scientist Office (Scottish Government Health Directorates)
  12. MRC [MR/K006525/1]
  13. Medical Research Council [MR/K006525/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  14. MRC [MR/K006525/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Little is known regarding the recognition of anxiety in children and young people (CYP) in primary care. This study examined trends in the presentation, recognition and recording of anxiety and of anxiolytic and hypnotic prescriptions for CYP in primary care. Method: A population based retrospective electronic cohort of individuals aged 6-18 years between 2003 and 2011 within the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) Databank primary care database was created. Incidence rates were calculated using person years at risk (PYAR) as a denominator accounting for deprivation, age and gender. Results: We identified a cohort of 311,343 registered individuals providing a total of 1,546,489 person years of follow up. The incidence of anxiety symptoms more than tripled over the study period (Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR)=3.55, 95% CI 2.65-4.77) whilst that of diagnosis has remained stable. Anxiolytic/hypnotic prescriptions for the cohort as a whole did not change significantly over time; however there was a significant increase in anxiolytic prescriptions for the 15-18 year age group (IRR 1.62, 95% CI 1.30-2.02). Limitations: There was a lack of reliable information regarding other interventions available or received at a primary, secondary or tertiary level such as psychological treatments. Conclusions: There appears to be a preference over time for the recording of general symptoms over diagnosis for anxiety in CYP. The increase in anxiolytic prescriptions for 15-18 year olds is discrepant with current prescribing guidelines. Specific guidance is required for the assessment and management of CYP presenting with anxiety to primary care, particularly older adolescents. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available