4.3 Article

Differences among antimicrobial properties of carrion beetle secretions reflect phylogeny and ecology

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ECOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages 719-729

Publisher

KLUWER ACADEMIC/PLENUM PUBL
DOI: 10.1023/B:JOEC.0000028427.53141.41

Keywords

Nicrophorus; burying beetle; antimicrobial; carrion beetle; Silphidae

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [1 P20 RR16469] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carrion beetles (Coleoptera: Silphidae) consist of two subfamilies in North America. Members of the Silphinae arrive at carcasses during the mid-stage of decay and their larvae feed on developing maggots, while members of the Nicrophorinae bury and tend carcasses upon which their developing larvae feed. The Nicrophorinae maintain the condition of the carcass by applying oral and anal secretions that reduce carcass decay apparently through bacterial inhibition, although quantification has not been made. We hypothesized that enzymes in the oral and anal secretions of the subfamily Nicrophorinae would inhibit bacterial growth, while secretions from the subfamily Silphinae would not. The secretions were assayed for inhibitory effects with a Microtox Analyzer that monitors the decrease in bioluminescence from the bacterium Vibrio fischerii. We found a significant difference of bioluminescence in the control compared to secretions of 8 out of 10 tested Nicrophorinae ( with oral secretions being most active), while only anal secretions from Necrodes surinimensis of the Siphinae significantly reduced bacterial survival. These data follow the known phylogenic relationship in which Necrodes is the closest genus to the Nicrophorinae. The two species of Nicrophorinae, which did not show significant reductions in bacterial growth, differ ecologically from the others. Thus, the presence of antimicrobial compounds in most Nicrophorinae secretions, but not in most other Silphinae, represents an adaptation to preserve the buried carcass.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available