Journal
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 38, Issue 7, Pages 966-973Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/382362
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Medical Research Council [MC_U190071468] Funding Source: researchfish
- Medical Research Council [MC_U190071468] Funding Source: Medline
- MRC [MC_U190071468] Funding Source: UKRI
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The purified protein derivative (PPD) skin test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection lacks specificity. We assessed 2 more specific M. tuberculosis antigens (ESAT-6 and CFP-10) by enzyme-linked immunospot assay (ELISPOT) compared with PPD by ELISPOT and skin test in The Gambia. Of 735 household contacts of 130 sputum smear-positive tuberculosis cases, 476 (65%) tested positive by PPD ELISPOT, 300 (41%) tested positive by PPD skin test, and 218 (30%) tested positive by ESAT-6/CFP-10 ELISPOT. Only 15 (2%) had positive ESAT-6/CFP-10 results and negative PPD results by ELISPOT. With increasing M. tuberculosis exposure, the percentage of subjects who were PPD skin test positive/ESAT-6/CFP-10 ELISPOT negative increased (P<.001), whereas the percentage of subjects who were PPD skin test negative/PPD ELISPOT positive decreased (P=.011). Eighteen (31%) ESAT-6/CFP-10 ELISPOT-positive subjects in the lowest exposure category had negative PPD skin test results. ESAT-6/CFP-10 ELISPOT probably offers increased specificity in the diagnosis of M. tuberculosis infection in this tropical setting of endemicity, at the cost of some sensitivity.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available