4.0 Article

Early failures of total hip replacement - Effects of surgeon volume

Journal

ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM
Volume 50, Issue 4, Pages 1338-1343

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/art.20148

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [P60-AR-47782, K24-AR-02123] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. To determine whether provider volume is associated with early failures following total hip replacement (THR) requiring revision. Methods. Claims data were analyzed to follow a cohort of 57,488 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent elective primary THR in 1995-1996 in 3,044 hospitals in the US. Patients were followed through the end of 1999. Failure of primary THR was defined as. a subsequent revision THR, as determined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth. Revision codes in hospital claims. Hospitals were stratified into 4 volume groups: low (<25 THRs/year), medium (26-50, 51-100 THRs/ year), and high (>100 THRs/year). Low-volume surgeons were defined as those surgeons performing <12 elective primary THRs annually in the Medicare population. Associations between the rates of revision and surgeon volume were determined by hazard ratios from a proportional hazard model, with adjustment for hospital volume, patient age, poverty status, sex, and comorbidities. We also examined whether the effect of surgeon volume on revision rates differed between the first 18 months postoperatively and later time periods. Results. Among 57,488 patients who had elective primary THR in 1995-1996, 2,537 (4.4%) had at least 1 revision THR by the end of 1999, with 1,437 (56.6%) of these revisions occurring within the first 18 months after the index primary THR. Median followup time was 47 months (range 0-54). Patients of high-volume surgeons were less likely to have revision THRs than patients of low-volume surgeons, regardless of hospital volume stratum. Further analysis revealed that the effect of surgeon volume on revisions was striking in the first 18 months after surgery but was not evident in the subsequent years. Conclusion. Patients of lore-volume surgeons have higher rates of revision THR than patients of high-volume surgeons, particularly within the first 18 months postoperatively. Referring clinicians should consider including surgeon volume among the factors influencing their choice of surgeon for elective THR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available