4.6 Article

Sizing of neutral sub 3 nm tungsten oxide clusters using Airmodus Particle Size Magnifier

Journal

JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE
Volume 87, Issue -, Pages 53-62

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2015.05.007

Keywords

Nanoparticles; Particle counters; Particle generation; Calibration

Funding

  1. European Research Council (ATMNUCLE) [227463]
  2. Academy of Finland (Center of Excellence Program) [1118615, 139656]
  3. Nordic Center for Excellence (CRAICC)
  4. European Commission seventh Framework program (ACTRIS) [262254]
  5. European Commission seventh Framework program (PEGASOS) [265148]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Measurement of the size distributions of neutral sub 3 nm aerosol particles is technically a challenging task. Here we present laboratory experiments on sizing of neutral tungsten oxide clusters with two independent methods: Airmodus A11 Particle Size Magnifier (PSM) and a combination of a high resolution differential mobility analyzer (DMA) and an electrometer. The test particles were generated with a hot wire generator, and their mass and composition were measured with a high resolution mass spectrometer. The particles were shown to be (WO3)(x) up to 12,000 amu or approximately 2 nm. As particle counters are usually calibrated with electrically charged particles but often measure mostly neutral particles, we quantified the enhancement due to charge to the PSM cut-off diameter to be approximately 0.1 nm. To compare directly the two methods, charged fraction of the sample particles and effect of organic impurity ions to the measured concentrations were estimated, and the PSM was shown to measure similar size classified concentrations as the combination of DMA and electrometer. The results confirm that with a sound characterization of the particle source and the particle counter, sub 3 nm neutral particle distributions can be measured with good precision with a method based on supersaturation scanning. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available