4.6 Review

N-linked glycosylation of the V3 loop and the immunologically silent face of gp120 protects human immunodeficiency virus type 1 SF162 from neutralization by anti-gp120 and anti-gp41 antibodies

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
Volume 78, Issue 7, Pages 3279-3295

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.78.7.3279-3295.2004

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI047708, AI47708, R01 AI051217, AI51217, R56 AI047708] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We examined how asparagine-linked glycans within and adjacent to the V3 loop (C2 and C3 regions) and -within the immunologically silent face (V4, C4, and V5 regions) of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) SF612 envelope affect the viral phenotype. Five of seven potential glycosylation sites are utilized when the virus is grown in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells, with the nonutilized sites lying within the V4 loop. Elimination of glycans within and adjacent to the V3 loop renders SF162 more susceptible to neutralization by polyclonal HIV+-positive and simian/human immunodeficiency virus-positive sera and by monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) recognizing the V3 loop, the CD4- and CCR5-binding sites, and the extracellular region of gp41. Importantly, our studies also indicate that glycans located within the immunologically silent face of gp120, specifically the C4 and V5 regions, also conferred on SF162 resistance to neutralization by anti-V3 loop, anti-CD4 binding site, and anti-gp41 MAbs but not by antibodies targeting the coreceptor binding site. We also observed that the amino acid composition of the V4 region contributes to the neutralization phenotype of SF162 by anti-V3 loop and anti-CD4 binding site MAbs. Collectively, our data support the proposal that the glycosylation and structure of the immunologically silent face of the HIV envelope plays an important role in defining the neutralization phenotype of HIV type 1.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available