4.7 Article

Novel placental and nonplacental serum markers in ectopic versus normal intrauterine pregnancy

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 81, Issue 4, Pages 1106-1111

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.08.049

Keywords

ectopic pregnancy; vascular endothelial growth factor; plasma protein A, P

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To evaluate whether the serum concentrations of novel placental markers and nonplacental markers differ in ectopic pregnancy when compared with normal intrauterine pregnancy. Design: Prospective clinical study. Setting: University hospital. Patient(s): Patients with confirmed ectopic pregnancy (EP) and control population with normal intrauterine pregnancy (IUP). Intervention(s): Laparoscopy. Main Outcome Measure(s): Serum concentrations of placental markers: pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A), pregnancy -specific beta(1)-glycoprotein (SP1), human placental lactogen (HPL), and HCG; and nonplacental markers: glycodelin, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and P. Result(s): The multiples of median of all markers (except VEGF) were decreased in EP when compared with the control group. Conversely, the serum values of VEGF were significantly increased in EP. VEGF showed a negative correlation with HCG and SP1, but not with PAPP-A, P, or the nonplacental markers. HCG, PAPP-A, SP1, and HPL strongly correlated with each other. But, in contrast to the above, P only correlated with HCG and, in contrast to the controls, with glycodelin. The combination of three independent markers in the formula VEGF/(PAPP-A X P) was found to be largely superior to the measure of any single marker. Conclusion(s): The triple marker analysis [VEGF/(PAPP-A X P] allows a clear discrimination between normal IUP and EP. (Fertil Steril(R) 2004;81:1106-11. (C) 2004 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available