4.5 Article

Beta cell differentiation during early human pancreas development

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 181, Issue 1, Pages 11-23

Publisher

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.1810011

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [G9826762, G9900837] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Medical Research Council [G9826762, G9900837] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. MRC [G9900837, G9826762] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding gene expression profiles during early human pancreas development is limited by comparison to studies in rodents. In this study, front the inception of pancreatic formation, embryonic pancreatic epithelial cells, approximately half of which were proliferative, expressed nuclear PDX1 and cytoplasmic CK19. Later, in the fetal pancreas, insulin was the most abundant hormone detected during the first trimester in largely non-proliferative cells. At sequential stages of early fetal development, as the number of insulm-positive cell clusters increased, the detection of CK19 in these cells diminished. PDX1 remained expressed in fetal beta cells. Vascular structures were present within the loose stroma surrounding pancreatic epithelial cells during embryogenesis. At 10 weeks post-conception (w.p.c.), all clusters containing more than ten insulin-positive cells had developed an intimate relationship with these vessels, compared with the remainder of the developing pancreas. At 12-13 w.p.c., human fetal islets, penetrated by vasculature, contained cells independently immunoreactive for insulin, glucagon, somatostatin and pancreatic polypeptide (PP), coincident with the expression of maturity markers prohormone convertase 1/3 (PC1/3), islet amyloid polypeptide, Chromogranin A and, more weakly, GLUT2. These data support the function of fetal beta cells as true endocrine cells by the end of the first trimester of human pregnancy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available