4.6 Article

Activation of innate immunity in patients with venous thrombosis: the Leiden Thrombophilia Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages 619-622

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.00689.x

Keywords

chemokine; cytokine; imflammation; risk factor; venous thrombosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Previous studies have suggested that levels of inflammatory mediators are risk indicators for venous thrombotic disease. We have Sought to confirm and extend these findings by measuring plasma tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 and IL-12p70 levels in a case-control study for venous thrombotic disease. Methods:: The plasma levels of these inflammatory mediators were measured by flow cytometric analysis using a multiplexed bead assay. Patient and control samples came from the Leiden Thrombophilia Study (474 controls and 474 patients). Results: In a subset of patients and controls inflammatory mediators are detectable in plasma. The crude odds ratios (ORs) associated with the presence of detectable markers were 2.1 [TNF-alpha, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1, 3.9], 1.7 (IL-1beta, 95% CI 1.1, 2.9) 2.4 (IL-6, 95% CI 1.9, 5.3), 2.8 (IL-8, 95%) (CI 1.8, 4.4) 0.8 (IL-10, 95% CI 0.3, 1.8). and 1.3 (IL-12p70, 95% CI 0.9, 2.0). Adjustment for putative confounders did not influence the risk estimates. Conclusion: TNF-alpha, IL-6. and IL-8 levels are risk determinants for venOLIS thrombosis. Individuals with detectable levels of either of these mediators in plasma have an OR of about 2. In line with these findings, the odds for the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 tend to be < 1. These results add further evidence for the contention that there is an inflammatory component to venous thrombotic disease and may explain why anti-inflammatory agents Such as aspirin may be effective for prevention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available