4.1 Article

Mouse cremaster venules are predisposed to light/dye-induced thrombosis independent of wall shear rate, CD18, ICAM-1, or P-selectin

Journal

MICROCIRCULATION
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 239-247

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10739680490425949

Keywords

arterioles; microcirculation; phototoxicity; platelets

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL064721, HL-42550, HL-64721] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI-46773] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Microvascular adhesion of platelets to endothelium occurs in response to various inflammatory stimuli, and in venules is often accompanied by adherent leukocytes. In a light/dye injury model, platelet adhesion and thrombi occur preferentially in venules, though the reasons for this predisposition are unknown. The authors sought to determine whether lower wall shear rates or leukocyte endothelial interactions accounted for preferential platelet thrombi formation in venules relative to arterioles. Methods: A light/dye injury model of microvascular thrombosis was used in the mouse cremaster microcirculation. Results: In wild-type mice (n = 17), the time to form microvascular platelet aggregates was delayed in arterioles by 3.1-fold relative to venules (p < .0001). However, arterioles with spontaneously low wall shear rates, as well as arterioles manipulated to reduce wall shear rate to venous levels, still had delayed thrombosis as compared to venules. Similarly, in animals deficient in CD18, P-selectin, or ICAM-1, the time to form platelet thrombi in arterioles was >3.0-fold higher than in venules. Conclusions: Mouse cremaster venules are predisposed to light/dye-induced microvascular thrombosis. The data suggest that functional differences between arteriolar and venular endothelial cells ( independent of wall shear rate and of CD18, P-selectin, and ICAM-1) account for the venular predisposition to thrombosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available