4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Efficacy of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation in medically stable patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Journal

CHEST
Volume 125, Issue 4, Pages 1400-1405

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1378/chest.125.4.1400

Keywords

amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; cough capacity; lung function test; mechanical insufflation-exsufflation; neuromuscular disease; noninvasive respiratory aids; noninvasive ventilation; peak cough flow

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine under what circumstances the use of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) can generate clinically effective expiratory flows for airway clearance (> 2.7 L/s) for clinically stable patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Materials and method: Twenty-six consecutive patients with ALS were studied, 15 with severe bulbar dysfunction. Using a pneumotachograph and with the aid of an oronasal mask, we measured FVC, FEV1 peak cough flow (PCF), maximum insufflation capacity (MIC), PCF generated from a maximum insufflation MIC (PCFmic), and PCF generated by MI-E (PCFmi-e). MI-E was delivered at :+/- 40 cm H2O. Maximum inspiratory pressure (PImax) and maximum expiratory pressure (PEmax) at the mouth were also measured. Results: Although both groups had a similar time from ALS symptom onset to diagnosis, statistical differences (p < 0.05) were found between nonbulbar and bulbar patients in lung function and cough capacity parameters: FVC, 2.58 +/- 1.24 L vs 1.62 +/- 0.74 L; FEV1, 2.26 +/- 1.18 L vs 1.54 +/- 0.69 L; PImax, - 93.45 +/- 47.47 em H2O VS - 3.64 +/- 25.07 cm H2O; PEmax, 140.45 +/- 75.98 em H2O vs; 69.93 +/- 32.14 em H2O; MIC, 3.02 +/- 1.22 L vs 1.97 +/- 0.75 L; PCF, 5.91 +/- 2.55 lUs vs 3.42 +/- 1.44 L/s; PCFmic, 6.68 +/- 2.71 L/s vs 4.00 +/- 1.48 L/s; and PCFmi-e, 4.34 +/- 0.82 L/s vs 3.35 +/- 0.77 L/s. Four patients with bulbar dysfunction and MIC > 1 L had PCFmi-e < 2.7 L/s. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed PCFmic of less than or equal to 2.7 L/s predicting those patients with PCFmi-e < 2.7 L/s. The ROC curve analysis showed PCFmic > 4 L/s predicting those patients with PCFmic greater than PCFmi-e. Conclusion: MI-E is able to generate clinically effective PCFmi-e (> 2.7L/s) for stable patients with ALS, except for those with bulbar dysfunction who also have a MIC > 1 L and PCFmic < 2.7 L/s who probably have severe dynamic collapse of the upper airways during the exsufflation cycle. Clinically stable patients with mild respiratory dysfunction and PCFmic > 4 L/s might not benefit from MI-E except during an acute respiratory illness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available