4.5 Article

Acoustic recognition in macaroni penguins: an original signature system

Journal

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
Volume 67, Issue -, Pages 615-625

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.03.012

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Penguins use vocal signatures as cues to identify their kin in dense colonies. Experimental studies of four species in two genera have pointed out that vocal signatures depend on the breeding ecology of the birds. Penguins that have a meeting site for pair members and chicks (genus Pygoscelis), as in many seabirds, have a less complex vocal signature than penguins that have no nests (genus Aptenodytes). To investigate whether this pattern would extend to other nest-building penguins, we studied the vocal signature in a species of the genus Eudyptes, the macaroni penguin, E. chrysolophus. Temporal and spectral features of signatures were analysed to determine which were likely to encode individual identity. Using a methodology derived from the theory of information, we measured and compared the amount of information given by each of these parameters by means of a stereotypy index. We then tested their effective efficiency in playback experiments of modified calls. Like Aptenodytes species, the macaroni penguins used a double coding system that integrated information in both the temporal and spectral domains. The encoding was made through the tempo given by the successive syllables of the call and the harmonic content of the call. However, information was not complementary but was mostly repeated in both domains, and variables were unidimensional as in Pygoscelis signatures. These results point out an original and simple signature system in macaroni penguins. Although they support the hypothesis of simpler systems in nest-building species they also reveal more subtle differences within this category. (C) 2004 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available