4.6 Article

Retinal neurodegeneration in the DBA/2J mouse - a model for ocular hypertension

Journal

ACTA NEUROPATHOLOGICA
Volume 107, Issue 4, Pages 352-358

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00401-003-0816-9

Keywords

ocular hypertension; model; DBA/2J mouse; apoptosis; electron microscopy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mice of the DBA/2J strain spontaneously develop complex ocular abnormalities, including glaucomatous loss of retinal ganglion cells (RGC). In the present study ultrastructural features of retinal neurodegeneration in DBA/2J mice of different age (3, 6, 8 and 11 months) are described. By 3 months, RGC apoptosis characterized by electron-dense karioplasm and cytoplasm of ganglion cells was observed. The occurrence of apoptotic ganglion cells peaked at the age of 6 months. Past this age, necrosis characterized by swelling and electron-rare cytoplasm appeared to be the prevailing form of cell death. Muller glia activation increased with age, but there were no signs of leukocyte infiltration. At 8 and 11 months, signs of neoangiogenesis were found both at the ultrastructural level and in clinical examinations. In these older animals myelin-like bodies, most probably representing the intracellular aggregates of phospholipids in irreversibly injured cells, were also seen. Photoreceptor cells were not affected at any age. Our observations suggest that retinal degeneration in the DBA/2J mice does not involve recruitment of blood-borne inflammatory/phagocytosing cells, and that apoptosis is gradually replaced by necrosis as the predominant pathway of RGC death. Retinal degeneration in 3- to 11-month-old DBA/2J mice partially resembles human pigment dispersion syndrome and pigmentary glaucoma with characteristic anterior segment changes and elevation of intraocular pressure. However, neovasculogenesis and myelin-like bodies are observed during aging. Therefore, the DBA/2J model requires judicious interpretation as a glaucoma model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available