4.7 Article

Trace of diffusion tensor differentiates the Parkinson variant of multiple system atrophy and Parkinson's disease

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 1443-1451

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.005

Keywords

Parkinson's disease; multiple system atrophy; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); trace of diffusion tensor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have recently shown that diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (DWI) discriminates patients with the Parkinson variant of multiple system atrophy (MSA-P) from those with Parkinson's disease (PD) by regional apparent diffusion coefficients (rADC) in the putamen. Because rADCs measured in one direction may underestimate diffusion-related pathologic processes, we investigated the diffusivity in different brain areas by trace of diffusion tensor (Trace(D)) in a new cohort of patients with MSA-P and PD. We studied 11 MSA-P, 17 PD patients, and 10 healthy volunteers matched for age and disease duration. Regional ADCs in three orthogonal directions and Trace(D) values were determined in selected brain regions including the basal ganglia, gray matter, white matter, substantia nigra, and pons. MSA-P patients had significantly higher putaminal and pallidal rTrace(D) values as well as rADCs in y- and z-direction than both PD patients and healthy volunteers. Moreover, putaminal Trace(D) discriminated completely MSA-P from both PD and healthy volunteers. The rADCs in the y- and z-direction provided a complete or near complete separation. In conclusion, our study confirms the results of previous studies of our group that patients with MSA-P show an increased putaminal diffusivity due to neuronal loss and gliosis. Because rADCs in one direction are dependent on the slice orientation relative to the directions of fiber tracts, Trace(D) imaging appears to be more accurate in the separation of MSA-P from PD. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available