4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Oestrogen receptor β:: Role in neurohypophyseal neurones

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages 365-371

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.0953-8194.2004.01187.x

Keywords

vasopressin; oxytocin; supraoptic; paraventricular; posterior pituitary

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS 44835, NS 27975] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The robust expression of oestrogen receptor beta (ER-beta) in magnocellular vasopressin neurones has focused attention on the role of this receptor and the gonadal steroids in the regulation of vasopressin secretion. Although the effects of gonadal steroids on vasopressin secretion have been the subject of many studies, there is no consensus in the literature as to their role. Possible reasons for the diverse findings are discussed, including diversity in the types, site and level of expression of steroid receptors across species, gender and physiological conditions. The physiological regulation of expression is of particular interest because ER-beta mRNA expression in vasopressin neurones is inversely correlated to the osmotic state of the animal. Chronic hyperosmolality inhibits ER-beta mRNA expression in magnocellular vasopressin neurones, while chronic hypo-osmolality enhances expression. This is consistent with an inhibitory role for ER-beta because hyperosmolality is a potent stimulus for vasopressin secretion, whereas vasopressin secretion is maximally inhibited by chronic hypo-osmolality. An inhibitory role is also indicated by in vitro experiments demonstrating inhibition of osmotically stimulated vasopressin secretion by oestrogen and testosterone, and ER-beta mediated inhibition of NMDA-stimulated vasopressin secretion. The challenge remains to elucidate the mechanism of this inhibition, and to understand its significance for maintenance of whole-body fluid and electrolyte homeostasis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available