4.5 Article

Disappearance of the post-lesional laminin immunopositivity of brain vessels is parallel with the formation of gliovascular junctions and common basal lamina.: A double-labelling immunohistochemical study

Journal

NEUROPATHOLOGY AND APPLIED NEUROBIOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages 169-177

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.0305-1846.2003.00524.x

Keywords

basal lamina; glia limitans; gliovascular junction; laminin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous studies revealed that during development the laminin immunopositivity gradually disappeared from the brain vessels. but temporarily re-appeared in them around lesions. The question of the present study was the correlation between the post-lesional vascular immunopositivity to laminin and the glial reaction. Following stab wounds, double fluorescent immunohistochemical labelling was performed against laminin (using a polyclonal antiserum against laminin 1) and glial fibrillary acidic protein. A number of vessels exhibited intense immunopositivity to laminin within the lesioned tissue. Where these laminin immunopositive vessels entered the perilesional brain substance, the astroglia formed contacts on them, and the separate vascular and glial basal laminae fused. The disappearance of the post-lesional laminin immunopositivity seemed to coincide with these phenomena. When monoclonal antibodies were applied against the beta1 and gamma1 laminin chains, vessels proved to be immunopositive at the lesion, but none in the intact brain tissue. No immunoreactivity was detected in the cases of alpha2 and beta2 chains. The results suggest that the disappearance of laminin immunopositivity may be attributed to that the epitopes become inaccessible for antibodies owing to the formation of gliovascular junctions and common basal lamina between astroglia and vessel. The possible role of an alteration in the laminin composition and the effect of fixation are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available