4.7 Article

Peer-to-peer based multimedia distribution service

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages 343-355

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMM.2003.822819

Keywords

load balance; multimedia distribution service; peer-to-peer; replication; topology-aware

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, there are many research interests in providing efficient and scalable multimedia distribution service. However, stringent quality-of-service (QoS) requirements for media distribution, as well as dynamically changing and heterogeneous network capacity in today's best effort Internet, bring many challenges. In this paper, we introduce a novel framework for multimedia distribution service based on peer-to-peer (P2P) networks. A topology-aware overlay is proposed in which hosts self-organize into groups. End hosts within the same group have similar network conditions and can easily collaborate with each other to achieve QoS awareness. In order to improve media delivery quality and provide high service availability, we further propose two distributed heuristic replication strategies, intergroup replication and intragroup replication, based on this topology-aware overlay. Specifically, intergroup replication is aimed to improve the efficiency of media content delivery between the group where a request is issued and the group where the content is stored. Also, intragroup replication is targeted at improving the availability of the content. Extensive simulation results show that the latency in our proposed architecture is 20% less than that of the FreeNet and 50% less than that of the randomly replication system. Simulation results also show that the video quality in our system is much better than that in the other two systems. Our P2P-based approach is also distributed, scalable, cost effective, and aware of the performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available