3.8 Article

Nitric oxide synthase in rat visual cortex: an immunohistochemical study

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH PROTOCOLS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 57-67

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresprot.2004.01.004

Keywords

nitric oxide synthase (NOS); visual cortex; endothelial NOS (eNOS); neuronal NOS (nNOS); immunocytochemistry rat

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of the present study was to identify the distribution of two isoforms of the nitric oxide synthase (NOS), the neuronal (nNOS) and the endothelial (eNOS) form, in rat visual cortex. Immunohistochemical localisation of each NOS isoform was studied with three tissue-processing protocols. In the first one, immunohistochemical reactions were made on 30-mum-thick sections with membrane detergents, Triton or Saponin, used to increase the permeability of the tissue for the antibodies. In the second protocol, we excluded these detergents from all solutions to avoid a destruction of the cellular membrane. In the third protocol, we used thin paraffin sections (5 put thick) to assure delivery of the antibodies to intracellular structures. Our data demonstrate, that both neuronal and endothelial isoforms of the NOS are present in the visual cortex, Among the neurones labelled by the antibodies against eNOS or nNOS, some excitatory cells were definitely present. nNOS immunopositive were neurones and a dense network of fibres, presumably axons. Some of the neurones were heavily labelled in a Golgi-like manner. while others showed only weak labelling. eNOS immunopositivity was found in the blood vessels and in neurotics. eNOS positive neurones were much more numerous than nNOS-containing cells, and represent about 60% of the cortical cells. However, with antibodies against eNOS, we never observed neurone-specific cell features. The NOS-containing cells found ill Our present Study represent a possible morphological substrate for production of nitric oxide (NO). (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available