4.4 Article

A replicable model for achieving over 90% follow-up rates in longitudinal studies of substance abusers

Journal

DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE
Volume 74, Issue 1, Pages 21-36

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2003.11.007

Keywords

longitudinal; follow-up; attrition; validity; methodology

Funding

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [R37 DA011323, 1R01 DA 11323, R01 DA015523, R01 DA011323] Funding Source: Medline
  2. CSAT SAMHSA HHS [5U P95 TI 00664] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The goals of this paper were to: (a) discuss the interface between dominant behavioral patterns of substance users and the development of a follow-up management model, (b) describe the components of the model, (c) present data regarding its effectiveness, (d) estimate the number of contacts for various follow-up rates, (e) explore the generalizability of the model across sub samples, and (f) present client outcome data that underscore the potential negative impact of low follow-up rates. The model has been used to follow-up over 12,000 research participants yielding over a 95% follow-up rate across seven studies (with over 90% completed within +/-14 days of their anniversary date). Using data from two of these studies (n = 2010, n = 632), 22 contacts or less captured 70% of the participants while 33 or 38 contacts or less captured 90% in the first and second studies, respectively. When outcome variables were compared based on 70% versus 90% follow-up, the results varied by study and within study. An examination of the effect of attrition on validity in these two samples demonstrated that even the traditionally acceptable 30% level of attrition can result in significant bias and that the nature of the bias is unpredictable. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available