4.4 Article

Preferential replication of FIV in activated CD4+CD25+T cells independent of cellular proliferation

Journal

VIROLOGY
Volume 321, Issue 2, Pages 307-322

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2004.01.014

Keywords

FIV; HIV; AIDS; latency; stimulation; anergy; apoptosis; reservoir

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI38177, AI43858] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies attempting to identify reservoirs of HIV-1 latency have documented that the virus persists as both a latent and productive infection in subsets of CD4+ cells. Reports regarding establishment of a stable HIV-1 infection in quiescent T cells in vitro, however, are controversial. In the present study, we investigated the susceptibility of naive and activated CD4(+) cell subsets (distinguished by differential expression of CD25) to feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) infection, their ability to replicate the virus, and potentially act as a reservoir for virus persistence in infected animals. While both CD4(+)CD25(+) and CD4(+)CD25(-) cells are susceptible to FIV infection in vitro and in vivo, only CD4(+)CD25(+) cells produce infectious virions when cultured with interleukin-2 (IL-2). Latently infected CD4(+)CD25(-) cells produce infectious virions following ConcanvalinA (ConA) stimulation, which correlates with upregulated surface expression of CD25. In contrast to CD4(+)CD25(-) cells, CD4(+)CD25(+) cells remain unresponsive to mitogen stimulation and are relatively resistant to apoptosis whether or not infected with FIV. The ability of CD4(+)CD25(+) cells to replicate FIV efficiently in the presence of IL-2 but remain anergic and unresponsive to apoptotic signaling suggests that these cells may provide a reservoir of productive FIV infection. On the contrary, CD4(+)CD25(-) cells seem to establish as latent viral reservoirs capable of being reactivated after stimulation. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available