Journal
CANCER
Volume 100, Issue 8, Pages 1683-1691Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20179
Keywords
melanoma; sentinel lymph nodes; pathology; immunohistochemistry
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
BACKGROUND. The optimal technique for sentinel lymph node (SN) assessment in patients with melanoma is controversial. Molecular analysis (reverse transcriptase- polymerase chain reaction) detects significantly greater numbers of SNs with suspected micrometastases (up to 71%) than does routine histopathology (approximately 20%). The authors sought to identify possible reasons for this discrepancy and to determine whether using an extended histopathologic protocol could University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. prove diagnostic precision. prove diagnostic precision. METHODS. Two hundred thirty-one SNs from 100 consecutive patients with cuta neous melanomas that measured 1-4 mm in thickness were bisected, and half of Denmark. the lymph node was examined according to an extensive histopathologic protocol involving serial sectioning and immunohistochemical analysis of 3 melanocyte-associated markers (S-100, HMB-45, and Melan-A). RESULTS. Lymph node melanocytic lesions were frequent, with micrometastases and benign nevus inclusions (BNI) found in SNs in 28% and 28% of patients, respectively (4 SNs contained both). Melan-A was the most sensitive immunohistochemical marker and was positive in all BNI-positive SNs and 97% of micrometastasis-positive SNs. Although HMB-45 showed differential labeling in micrometastases compared with BNI (82% vs. 16%), immunohistochemistry could not distinguish between those lesions. Micrometastases were already identified on the first central level in 49% of positive SNs, whereas only 23% of SNs with BNl were diagnosed on the first level. CONCLUSIONS. Extensive serial sectioning with immunohistochemical analysis substantially increased the histopathologic detection of micrometastases and BNI in melanoma SNs to a level approaching the level reported for molecular techniques. The large number of BNIs represents an important potential source of imprecision (false positivity) in SN assays based on nonmorphologic methods. (C) 2004 American Cancer Society.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available