4.5 Article

Glucose production, gluconeogenesis, and hepatic tricarboxylic acid cycle fluxes measured by nuclear magnetic resonance analysis of a single glucose derivative

Journal

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 327, Issue 2, Pages 149-155

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2003.12.036

Keywords

liver metabolism; glucose turnover; gluconeogenesis; NMR; stable isotope tracers; citric acid cycle

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR-02584] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-34557] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK16194] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A triple-tracer method was developed to provide absolute fluxes contributing to endogenous glucose production and hepatic tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle fluxes in 24-h-fasted rats by H-2 and C-13 nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analysis of a single glucose derivative. A primed, intravenous [3,4-C-13(2)] glucose infusion was used to measure endogenous glucose production; intraperitoneal (H2O)-H-2 (to enrich total body water) was used to quantify sources of glucose (TCA cycle, glycerol, and glycogen), and intraperitoneal [U-C-13(3)] propionate was used to quantify hepatic anaplerosis, pyruvate cycling, and TCA cycle flux. Plasma glucose was converted to monoacetone glucose (MAG), and a single H-2 and C-13 NMR spectrum of MAG provided the following metabolic data (all in units of mumol/kg/min; n = 6): endogenous glucose production (40.4 +/- 2.9), gluconeogenesis from glycerol (11.5 +/- 3.5), gluconeogenesis from the TCA cycle (67.3 +/- 5.6), glycogenolysis (1.0 +/- 0.8), pyruvate cycling (154.4 +/- 43.4), PEPCK flux (221.7 +/- 47.6), and TCA cycle flux (49.1 +/- 16.8). In a separate group of rats, glucose production was not different in the absence of (H2O)-H-2 and [U-C-13]propionate, demonstrating that these tracers do not alter the measurement of glucose turnover. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available