4.5 Article

Genetic immunisation against hepatitis B using whole bacteriophage λ particles

Journal

VACCINE
Volume 22, Issue 13-14, Pages 1666-1671

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2003.10.047

Keywords

DNA vaccination; bacteriophage lambda; hepatitis B; rabbits

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mice and rabbits have been vaccinated with whole bacteriophage lambda particles containing a DNA vaccine expression cassette under the control of the CMV promoter (enhanced green fluorescent protein [lambda-EGFP] or hepatitis B surface antigen [lambda-HBsAg]). Mice were vaccinated twice intramuscularly (i.m.) with 5 x 10(9) of lambda-EGFP phage (containing 250 ng DNA) and exhibited specific anti-EGFP responses 28 days post-vaccination. Rabbits were vaccinated i.m. with 4 x 10(10) of lambda-HBsAg phage (2 mug DNA) or recombinant HBsAg protein. Following two vaccinations with lambda-HBsAg, one out of four rabbits exhibited high level anti-HBsAg responses (comparable to those seen using the recombinant HBsAg protein). Following a third vaccination with lambda-HBsAg, all four rabbits showed similar high level responses which have not decreased after more than 6 months. High anti-phage responses were observed in all animals following the first immunization with lambda-HBsAg, indicating that a high antibody titre against the phage carrier did not prevent a subsequent immune response against the DNA vaccine component. Compared to results in mice using equivalent lambda-HBsAg doses, anti-HBsAg responses were much higher in rabbits, which could indicate a swamping effect in mice. Since phage lambda DNA is approximately 50 kb in size (tenfold larger than most plasmid vectors used for naked DNA immunisation), a comparable dose of phage lambda DNA given as intact phage particles actually delivers tenfold less vaccine DNA on a per gene copy (molar) basis. Thus the efficiency of the technique may be even higher than the data at first suggests. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available