4.7 Article

Multifrequency observations of radio pulse broadening and constraints on interstellar electron density microstructure

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 605, Issue 2, Pages 759-783

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/382680

Keywords

ISM : structure; methods : data analysis; pulsars : general radio; continuum : general; scattering

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have made observations of 98 low Galactic latitude pulsars to measure pulse broadening caused by multipath propagation through the interstellar medium. Data were collected with the 305 m Arecibo telescope at four radio frequencies between 430 and 2380 MHz. We used a CLEAN-based algorithm to deconvolve interstellar pulse broadening from the measured pulse shapes. We employed two distinct pulse-broadening functions (PBFs): PBF1 is appropriate for a thin screen of scattering material between the Earth and a pulsar, while PBF2 is appropriate for scattering material uniformly distributed along the line of sight from the Earth to a pulsar. We found that some observations were better fitted by PBF1 and some by PBF2. Pulse-broadening times (tau(d)) are derived from fits of PBFs to the data and are compared with the predictions of a smoothed model of the Galactic electron distribution. Several lines of sight show excess broadening, which we model as clumps of high-density scattering material. A global analysis of all available data finds that the pulse broadening scales with frequency, v, as tau(d) proportional to v(-alpha), where alpha similar to 3.9 +/- 0.2. This is somewhat shallower than the value alpha = 4.4 expected from a Kolmogorov medium but could arise if the spectrum of turbulence has an inner cutoff at similar to300-800 km. A few objects follow particularly shallow scaling laws (the mean scaling index (alpha) similar to 3.1 +/- 0.1 and similar to3.8 +/- 0.2, respectively, for PBF1 and PBF2), which may arise from large-scale refraction or from the truncation of scattering screens transverse to the Earth-pulsar line of sight.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available