4.7 Review

Molecular systematics of Salmonidae: combined nuclear data yields a robust phylogeny

Journal

MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages 658-679

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2003.08.012

Keywords

Salmonidae; phylogeny; total evidence; anadromy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The phylogeny of salmonid fishes has been the focus of intensive study for many years. but some of the most important relationships within this group remain unclear. We used 269 Genbank sequences of mitochondrial DNA (from 16 genes) and nuclear DNA (from nine genes) to infer phylogenies for 30 species of salmonids. We used maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood to analyze each gene separately, the mtDNA data combined, the nuclear data combined, and all of the data together. The phylogerly with the best overall resolution and support from bootstrapping and Bayesian analyses was inferred from the combined nuclear DNA data set. for which the different genes reinforced and complemented one another to a considerable degree. Addition of the mitochondrial DNA degraded the phylogenetic signal, apparently as a result of saturation, hybridization, selection, or some combination of these processes. By the nuclear-DNA phylogeny: (1) (Hucho hucho. Brachymystax lenok) form the sister group to (Salmo. Salvelinus. Oncorhynchus H. perryi): (2) Salmo is the sister-group to (Oncorhynchus, Salvelinus); (3) Salvelinus is the sister-group to Oncorhynchus: and (4) Oncorhynchus masou forms a monophyletic group with O. mykiss and O. clarki. with these three taxa constituting the sister-group to the five other Oncorhynchus species. Species-level relationships within Oncorhynchus and Salvelinus were well Supported by bootstrap levels and Bayesian analyses. These findings have important implications for understanding the evolution of behavior, ecology and life-history in Salmonidae. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available