4.5 Article

Sex-dependent effects of gonadal steroids and cortisol on cardiac contractility in rainbow trout

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
Volume 207, Issue 12, Pages 2083-2093

Publisher

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.00996

Keywords

steroid hormone; cardiac function; cortisol; 17 beta-estradiol; androgen; inotropism; rainbow trout; Oncorhynchus mykiss

Categories

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P20 RR16454] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to determine whether steroid hormones modulate cardiac function in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum). We assessed the effects of exogenously administered steroids on isolated ventricle strips and report that physiological concentrations of androgens, 17beta-estradiol and cortisol rapidly (<10 min) enhance inotropism (30-40%) in a sex-specific manner. These effects were specific to the hormones studied, absent if animals were anesthetized chemically and dependent upon steroid concentration and contraction frequency. Based on the use of specific steroid receptor antagonists and key enzyme inhibitors, it appears that testosterone, 11-ketotestosterone and cortisol each act through specific intracellular receptors in males and that the positive inotropism requires the synthesis of polyamines and nitric oxide. Cortisol and 17beta-estradiol, but not androgens, had similar effects in females and also involved similar signaling pathways. Androgen and cortisol effects were additive in males but cortisol and 17beta-estradiol were not additive in females, suggesting sex differences in the pathways through which these hormones stimulate inotropism. In summary, gonadal steroids and cortisol promote ventricular contractility in a sex-dependent manner through mechanisms that appear multifaceted. Ultimately, steroid-mediated improvements in cardiac performance might involve non-genomic pathways and tie physiologically important during migration, spawning or stressful periods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available