4.6 Article

HCN survey of normal spiral, infrared-luminous, and ultraluminous galaxies

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES
Volume 152, Issue 1, Pages 63-80

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/383003

Keywords

galaxies : ISM; galaxies : starburst; infrared : galaxies; ISM : molecules; radio lines : galaxies; surveys

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report systematic HCN J = 1 - 0 ( and CO) observations of a sample of 53 infrared (IR) and/or CO-bright and/or luminous galaxies, including seven ultraluminous infrared galaxies, nearly 20 luminous infrared galaxies, and more than a dozen of the nearest normal spiral galaxies. This is the largest and most sensitive HCN survey of galaxies to date. All galaxies observed so far follow the tight correlation between the IR luminosity L-IR and the HCN luminosity L-HCN initially proposed by Solomon, Downes, & Radford, which is detailed in a companion paper. We also address here the issue of HCN excitation. There is no particularly strong correlation between L-HCN and the 12 mum luminosity; in fact, of all the four IRAS bands, the 12 mum luminosity has the weakest correlation with the HCN luminosity. There is also no evidence of stronger HCN emission or a higher ratio of HCN and CO luminosities L-HCN/L-CO for galaxies with excess 12 mum emission. This result implies that mid-IR radiative pumping, or populating, of the J = 1 level of HCN by a mid-IR vibrational transition is not important compared with the collisional excitation by dense molecular hydrogen. Furthermore, large velocity gradient calculations justify the use of HCN J = 1 - 0 emission as a tracer of high-density molecular gas (greater than or similar to3 x 10(4)/tau cm(-3)) and give an estimate of the mass of dense molecular gas from HCN observations. Therefore, L-HCN may be used as a measure of the total mass of dense molecular gas, and the luminosity ratio L-HCN/L-CO may indicate the fraction of molecular gas that is dense.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available